U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) has reintroduced a constitutional amendment to overturn the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United, and other precedent-setting rulings, which have made it impossible to regulate billions in campaign spending over the last two decades.
The amendment would also overturn the Supreme Court decision in Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett, which struck down an Arizona law that allowed public financing of a candidate if their opponent exceeded certain spending limits.
“With the advent of vast and anonymous campaign spending this past election cycle, it’s clear that we need real campaign finance reform now more than ever,” Schiff said. “As a result of the Supreme Court’s artificial distinction between contributions to a candidate and direct expenditures that have the same effect, Super PACs and secret donors are the norm rather than the exception. My amendment is simple — it would allow Congress to set reasonable limits, and allow states to set up public financing for candidates, if they choose to do so. I have always been loath to amend the Constitution, but the tragic line of decisions by the Supreme Court has severely threatened the very health of our democracy. Something must be done, and it begins with overturning Citizens United.”
Schiff’s legislation was drafted in consultation with Harvard Law Professor Laurence H. Tribe, one of the nation’s preeminent constitutional scholars. He was joined in introducing the bill on June 24 by U.S. Reps. Matt Cartwright, Steve Cohen, Mark DeSaulnier, John Garamendi, Jim Himes, William Keating, Barbara Lee, Stephen Lynch, Eleanor Holmes Norton, Charles Rangel, Niki Tsongas, Chris Van Hollen, and Peter Welch.
The amendment states, “Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to forbid Congress or the states from imposing reasonable content-neutral limitations on private campaign contributions or independent election expenditures, or from enacting systems of public campaign financing, including those designed to restrict the influence of private wealth by offsetting campaign spending or independent expenditures with increased public funding.”
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.